Another Big Nail in America's Racial Coffin

Another Big Nail in America's Racial Coffin

 

When does ”enough!” become “too much”?
When does the rapidly-spreading pandemic of black violence in America exceed acceptable “norms”?

When will Barack Hussein Obama’s mainstream media begin fulfilling their journalistic responsibilities and report the extent of the ongoing murderous horrors being perpetrated by America’s domestic enemies?

When will Americans wake up to the reality that  we are under an unrelenting attack by people of color and that few people give a damn?

Given the pervasive, deadly cancers of political correctness and  America’s mindless quest for diversity, the answer to those questions is probably never.

It’s literally amazing that Americans, as well as the Brits, the French, the Dutch, the Swedes, et al. who are all experiencing similar assaults on native Britons, French men and French women, Swedish men and women etc., yet they and we are seemingly incapable of ending them.

It’s all inexplicable until we factor in political correctness which dictates that the mainstream media refuse to honestly report the seriousness and extent of black-on-white violence and that it is the direct consequence of white racism and discrimination, anyway.

So, there you have it, folks.  The reason blacks are going wild is due to whites–and the racist administration of President Barack Hussein Obama has absolutely nothing to do with the unprecedented phenomenon, not the pronouncements by Attorney General and certainly not those of First Lady Michelle Obama that ours is still a racist country, a false and pernicious allegation that only adds volatile fuel and encouragement to black malcontents seeking to wreak vengeance on their supposed oppressors.

The conclusion that blacks bear no responsibility for what they do to whites is tantamount to claiming slavery in America was the direct result of African chieftains selling their own people to white slavers. 

Indeed, that largely-forgotten, crass betrayal of Africans by Africans was a contributing though not the only factor in the enslavement of millions of Africans in our country, a grievous national sin for which we have paid dearly with huge expenditures of blood, tears, and treasure.

However, nothing that happened centuries ago comes close to explaining what is happening today among the African-American community as frequently detailed here. 

Among the most recent instances of blacks attacking and murdering innocent whites, one has to be deemed near the pinnacle of utter contempt for civilized behavior. . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=38108.)

 

 

 

O.J. Simpson and Black Entitlement

O.J. Simpson and Black Entitlement

 

If not a puff piece, the Sports Illustrated story of June 16, 2014, “20 Years Later: Highway to Hell,” regarding O.J. Simpson clearly wasn’t completely honest either. 

 

For one thing, the incarcerated O.J. is not on a highway to anywhere except maybe to his comfy cell and to a prison cafeteria.  For another, the extensively detailed article by Greg Bishop and Thayer Evans never once mentions jury nullification or the fact Simpson’s explosive trial and exoneration marked the beginning of what may be called “The Age of Black Entitlement” which, under the reign of President Barack Hussein Obama, has metastasized into “The Age of Black Supremacy.”

 

And, all because of a double murder twenty years ago.

 

Orenthal James “O. J.” “The Juice” Simpson will soon be 67 years of age and will be locked up at the Lovelock Correctional Center in Lovelock, Nevada at least until he’s 71 when he will face another parole board hearing to determine whether he should be released or serve out the remainder of his 33 year term for a 2007 armed robbery.

 

If he reaches 96, inmate Number 1027820 will still be a lucky man and not just because he wasn’t given a life sentence, for which he was originally eligible, but because he had escaped execution by lethal injection for the June 12th, 1994 murders of his estranged wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her waiter-friend-possible lover, Ronald Lyle Goldman.

 

Most people are familiar with the farcical, low-speed chase of Simpson’s white Bronco as well as with the internationally-televised People of the State of California vs. Orenthal James Simpson, the nine-month so-called “trial of the century” a year later which ended in an acquittal of the former college and NFL football star turned actor, a verdict rendered by a jury consisting of nine African-Americans, one Hispanic, two white women, and widely considered a tragic instance of jury nullification.

 

Usually a travesty of justice, jury nullification involves a jury returning a not guilty verdict despite a preponderance of evidence to the contrary and believing the defendant is deserving of  exoneration on the basis of extraneous circumstances.  Essentially, the jury nullifies a law it believes is either immoral or wrongly applied to the defendant. 

 

In O.J.’s case, his jury rendered its verdict not on the basis that the law prohibiting murder was immoral but rather based on the jurors’ certainty that he was discriminated against because he was black.  Pre-trial, his battery of wealthy, mostly white attorneys had actually tried to stack the jury with more blacks by objecting to the exclusion of two potential jurors who were black just in case their planned “If the glove don’t (sic) fit” defense didn’t work. 

 

Thanks to his blatantly racially-biased jurors, . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=37685.)

Ending the America We Know and Love (Part Two)

Ending the America We Know and Love (Part Two)

 

We have been conditioned by our progressive president and his lap dog, mainstream media to believe that the massive explosion of black violence is really an illusion concocted by white racists. 

Although it is difficult tell from most media, those often savage attacks are on the rise in America and, along with the acceptance of rampant homosexuality and legalized abortion, are unmistakable evidence of the moral decay now destroying our country.

In truth, the only illusion regarding black rampaging has been created by liberal-leftist progressives who have colluded in denying and covering up the existence of that violence ostensibly in the interests of maintaining what remains of civil order.

A newsflash for those progressives: Your appeasement isn’t even close to working.

Editors at the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, and the Chicago Tribune have publicly conceded that they deliberately censor information about black crime for political reasons.

In June 2011, in an attempt to defend that censorship to its readers following an explosion of black-on-white mob violence in Downtown Chicago, the Tribune’s Gerould Kern disingenuously admitted that his ”newspaper” conceals and downplays black crime in order to “guard against subjecting an entire group of people to suspicion.”

He elaborated by lying, “We do not reference race unless it is a fact that is central to telling the story. By all indication, these attacks were motivated by theft, not race.  Further, there is no evidence to suggest that the victims were singled out because of their race. Therefore we did not include racial descriptions in our initial news reports.”

Kern wrapped up his cover-up of a cover-up by adding another falsehood: “There are circumstances when race may be relevant, such as describing a criminal suspect being sought by police.”

First of all, in a city with a 30% white population where only white people were attacked, ardent liberal-leftist Kern actually suggested that the color of the victims’ skin was coincidental at best? 

Secondly, his reference to Tribune’s identifying the race of assailants when it’s “relevant” borders on the comical; his paper and the rest of Obama’s mainstreamers rarely, if ever, report the race of criminals unless, that is, the criminal happened to be white.

Gerould Kern’s twisted mindset is not unique any more than that particular incident was unique.  Unfortunately for all of us, both his lies concerning rampant black mayhem and the incidents have mushroomed in the last few years, coincidentally with Obama’s first election.

When Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. dreamed in 1963 that his “four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character,” could he have dreamt that within less than three generations his now-grown kids would live in a nation which has absolutely no regard for the content of African-American character and not only overlooks their sins but viciously abuses his fellow African-Americans should they stray from the Gerould Kern mold?

(In fact, as I’ve already documented, the sainted Dr. King probably did dream that and worse for our nation!)

Meanwhile, outstanding African-Americans such as black conservatives Ward Connerly, Ken Hamblin, Niger Innis, Alan Keyes, Thomas Sowell, Walter E. Williams, et al. are regularly condemned by race agitators as “Uncle Toms” and worse for their recognition of the reality that most racist assaults in America are committed by blacks. 

Thanks to Obama and his minions who deny its very existence, the ignored mayhem goes on and on as demonstrated by the increasingly popular and brutal “knockout game” . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=37022.)