The Vicious Murder of Carroll Jordan, Age 86

The Vicious Murder of Carroll Jordan, Age 86

 

For obvious reasons, President Barack Hussein Obama’s mainstream media and their cohorts in the entertainment world still refuse to concede that there is an ongoing war conducted by blacks in America against anyone not black despite mounting evidence to the contrary.
 
Motivated by their blind loyalty to the man they enthusiastically supported for over six years as the savior of our country and the planet, they can’t now admit the president is largely responsible for that war thanks to his racist policies so they simply deny the existence of the conflict.

For example, the MSM have dutifully ignored or downplayed the “knockout game” in which young black men–who could very well resemble the president’s sons–cold cock innocent, unsuspecting white people to prove their self-conceived superiority by cowardly flattening them and often videotaping their assaults as verification of their masculinity.

As he scoffed on “The Daily Show,” Comedy Central’s liberal-leftist “newscaster” Jon Stewart firmly believes the rarely-reported yet widespread incidents of the “knockout game” are wildly exaggerated and Stewart certainly doesn’t favor more severe legal penalties for such assaults because, well, because they occur so rarely.

Not that it would bother them or convince how gravely wrong the mainstreamers and people like Stewart have been, but eighty-six year old, Carroll Jordan might beg to differ–if he were able about America’s epidemic of black violence. 

The Korean War veteran was not a “knockout game” victim but rather the. . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=38707.)

Ferguson and Michael Brown, Microcosms of MSM Hypocrisy

Ferguson and Michael Brown, Microcosms of MSM Hypocrisy

 

With notable exceptions, President Barack Hussein Obama’s mainstream media studiously, obediently, avoid mention of the race of wanted and suspected criminals even when identifying their race would greatly aid in their apprehension and possibly obviate repeat crimes.

The exceptions invariably include situations in which the criminality has become public knowledge through some source–and almost always when the suspect is white.

The practice of concealing the ethnicity of black suspects pre-dated the Obama administration and was defended by Chicago Tribune Editor Gerould Kern as an effort “to guard against subjecting an entire group of people [blacks] to suspicion” and to forestall racial unrest.

The MSM’s and Kern’s rationale has been repeatedly shown to be an abject failure as evidenced by the riots in Ferguson, Missouri, riots, looting, and burning in premature overreaction to the shooting death of Michael Brown by a Ferguson policeman. 

If anything, pretending violence among African-Americans isn’t rampant simply fuels more violence by other blacks who may think the media are on their side.

Obama’s media has truly outdone itself with this story, almost outdoing their misrepresentations and outright distortions two years ago involving the case of George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin when they plumbed new depths of journalistic and ethical irresponsibility.

As with Martin, much of the MSM quickly jumped to unfounded conclusions as to Officer Darren Wilson’s guilt as well as concealing details which conflicted with their politically correct political agenda aimed at portraying Brown as the innocent, black victim of endemic, racial prejudice and Wilson as his bigoted, white, merciless executioner.

—They have in effect tried and convicted the six-year police veteran Wilson of murder while depicting the new high school graduate Brown as just another unarmed black kid who was targeted only because of his race.  

---They have . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=38590.)

NBC News Skews Its Own Poll

NBC News Skews Its Own Poll

 

In the jaded tradition of the New York Times’ unstated motto of printing all the news it sees fit to print and trashing all the rest, NBC News spinmeisters managed to distort the results of a poll it conducted in conjunction with the Wall Street Journal.

While headlining the outcome, “America’s Fed Up: Obama Approval Rating Hits All-Time Low, Poll Shows” and citing such results as, “Six in 10 Americans are dissatisfied with the state of the U.S. economy, more than 70 percent believe the country is headed in the wrongc direction” with “President Barack Obama’s overall approval rating hitting a new low at 40 percent, and a mere 14 percent of the public giving Congress a thumbs up,” NBC went on to downplay its own headline.

Instead, the network focused on the “lingering” consequences of the Great Recession rather than on the causes of that lingering, Obama and his failed economic policies, and on what type of posters people would carry.

The telephone survey of a thousand registered adults was conducted by Democratic pollster Peter Hart and Republican pollster Bill McInturff over the course of five days (July 30-August 3, margin of error 3.1%) yet the NBCNews.com report by Mark Murray ignored their most salient findings.

In a transparent effort to deflect as much of the blame as possible for American discontent from Obama, Murray emphasizes the disaffection with Republicans and Congress, (“But if the president’s numbers are bad, Congress’ are even worse”). . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=38420.)

Boobs and Babies, Guns and Death

Boobs and Babies, Guns and Death

 

I’ve long suspected that those adamantly opposed to the constitutionally-guaranteed right of Americans under the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms for both the protection of themselves and their families and for protection from and resistance against a tyranical government were foolish and ignorant.

In a word, I felt they were boobs.

That feeling was reinforced at a recent demonstration for gun control during which a fanatical opponent of that fundamental right displayed her breasts poorly masked by a placard declaring, “Boobs feed babies and bring joy and comfort.  Guns only bring death.  More boobs, less guns.”

Well, that’s not exactly true although the unidentified fanatic did accomplish one thing: She proved her cup size far exceeded her intelligence quotient.

Aside from her grammatical faux pas, (the correct usage would be “fewer”, not “less” guns), Ms. Boobie also clearly demonstrated her obliviousness of reality with regard to how, when, and why guns are used in America and how many lives they have saved.

As frequently documented here, guns are not only legally used by millions of Americans for hunting and then consuming the products of their hunts but they have been used far more often to save and protect lives than for criminal purposes.

Though it’s incontrovertible that firearms are often indiscriminately used to commit crimes and kill, Ms. B.’s exhibitionism and placard fail to factor in the reality that those crimes and killings are largely confined to ghetto areas and, when they occur outside those areas, are mostly committed by residents of those ghettos engaged in murderous rampages outside their communities.

However, the MSM prefers to focus on gun atrocities which are anomalies rather than the norm.  When mentally disturbed people such as Adam Lanza slaughter school children and other innocents, the mainstreamers invariably ramp up their gun control campaign as if guns and not the mentally disturbed and criminal miscreants are the problem. 

Obsessed with the idea that guns are evil, . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=38335.)

Another Big Nail in America's Racial Coffin

Another Big Nail in America's Racial Coffin

 

When does ”enough!” become “too much”?
When does the rapidly-spreading pandemic of black violence in America exceed acceptable “norms”?

When will Barack Hussein Obama’s mainstream media begin fulfilling their journalistic responsibilities and report the extent of the ongoing murderous horrors being perpetrated by America’s domestic enemies?

When will Americans wake up to the reality that  we are under an unrelenting attack by people of color and that few people give a damn?

Given the pervasive, deadly cancers of political correctness and  America’s mindless quest for diversity, the answer to those questions is probably never.

It’s literally amazing that Americans, as well as the Brits, the French, the Dutch, the Swedes, et al. who are all experiencing similar assaults on native Britons, French men and French women, Swedish men and women etc., yet they and we are seemingly incapable of ending them.

It’s all inexplicable until we factor in political correctness which dictates that the mainstream media refuse to honestly report the seriousness and extent of black-on-white violence and that it is the direct consequence of white racism and discrimination, anyway.

So, there you have it, folks.  The reason blacks are going wild is due to whites–and the racist administration of President Barack Hussein Obama has absolutely nothing to do with the unprecedented phenomenon, not the pronouncements by Attorney General and certainly not those of First Lady Michelle Obama that ours is still a racist country, a false and pernicious allegation that only adds volatile fuel and encouragement to black malcontents seeking to wreak vengeance on their supposed oppressors.

The conclusion that blacks bear no responsibility for what they do to whites is tantamount to claiming slavery in America was the direct result of African chieftains selling their own people to white slavers. 

Indeed, that largely-forgotten, crass betrayal of Africans by Africans was a contributing though not the only factor in the enslavement of millions of Africans in our country, a grievous national sin for which we have paid dearly with huge expenditures of blood, tears, and treasure.

However, nothing that happened centuries ago comes close to explaining what is happening today among the African-American community as frequently detailed here. 

Among the most recent instances of blacks attacking and murdering innocent whites, one has to be deemed near the pinnacle of utter contempt for civilized behavior. . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=38108.)

 

 

 

Barry Obama, Bill Maher, Hillary Clinton Self-Exposed!

Barry Obama, Bill Maher, Hillary Clinton Self-Exposed!

What people say in public is often far more indicative of their character and prejudices than what they do in public.

What follows is a brief summary of things three very public people have said that expose them as stupid, bigoted, and hypocritical, none of which statements will ever be seen on America’s mainstream media since they reveal liberal-leftists for what they are, namely stupid, bigoted, hypocritical lib-leftists.

President Barack Hussein Obama
Obama gave the commencement speech at Worcester Tech high school, a “turn around” school, and told the graduates he didn’t remember much about his own high school graduation, even the commencement speaker because, as he said, “I’m sure I was thinking about the party after graduation.”  He added, “I don’t remember the party either. I’m just telling the truth here.”

He also contended that his family at times “had to scrape to get by,” even though his family somehow found the resources to send him to the elite Punahou School in Honolulu, a fact he forgot to mention to the Worcester grads.

The true truth, as opposed to Barry’s version of reality, is that he was so wasted on the drugs he has admitted to taking in his youth to recall much of anything, not even that he and his family never did any “scraping” to get by, a convenient lie that certainly endeared him to his future supporters and which conveniently escaped the attention of his MSM–along with the multiplicity of his other lies concerning just about anything he feels compelled to twist.

Even absent his trusty teleprompters, to suggest to mostly black Worcester high school students that he was either drunk or on a drug high at his graduation was grossly inappropriate.  In that venue, perhaps he should have reverted to form by lying and saying he was too busy to attend because he was working somewhere to help his family scrape by.

Bill Maher

Maher, the failed comedian turned talk show host and political commentator, specializes in idiocy and doesn’t seem to lie nearly as much as his hero, Obama, and instead regularly spews filth and obscenities in vain efforts to compensate for his lack of talent.

Maher’s foul vitriol, (including but hardly limited to such gems as “Jesus just f*cked Tebow bad,” “Kill Mitt Romney,” “Kill Paul Ryan,” “there is always a good moral Christian reason to tell everyone you meet to f*** off and die,” calling Sarah Palin a “dumb twat” and a “c*nt” and the Pope a child rapist), is as legendary as his anti-Catholic bigotry.

He once again demonstrated the depth of his perverted anger following House Majority Leader Rep. Eric Cantor’s defeat in the Virginia Republican primary this week. 

Reflecting on the Tea Party’s effect in that election, Maher launched into an amazingly irrelevant but revelatory tirade against Christians in Congress. . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=37793.)

Liberal-Leftist Hatred

Liberal-Leftist Hatred

 

Since they are often subjectively applied, the words “hate” and “hatred” have been deemed among the most volatile and combative terms in English language usage, exceeded in their volatility and hostility only by the newly popular “racist” and “racism” epithets.

Certain words can be almost as hateful as certain actions and a few select words such as “nigger” and, most recently, “retard” and ”retarded,” have been judged so offensive that the judges want them banned entirely and want those accused of violating the latest hot button issue, “bullying,”  persecuted and prosecuted as criminals.

There is certainly merit in voluntary restrictions on the use of objectively hateful terminology and actions.  However, unofficially proscribing and officially criminalizing them smacks of censorship, thought crime, which was condoned in George Orwell’s Airstrip One but is hardly acceptable in currently free America.

Ironically, the chief proponents of banning disturbing language, usually characterized as racist “hate speech,” and of prosecuting bulliers, commonly those who allegedly harass homosexuals, are precisely the same individuals and groups that, with relative impunity, practice the most egregious forms of hate speech and commit the worst hate crimes, namely liberal-leftists and the people they are supposedly protecting.

Also ironic is the lib-left’s successful propagandizing, a success attributable to the complicity of Barack Hussein Obama and his mainstream media.

They have convinced millions of Americans that they are benevolent sorts who only wish the best for people, that they love all mankind, that they merely want to change the world into a socialistic paradise where everyone is happy and content with their lots in life, that they are “liberal” in every way whereas in actuality their philosophy is an oft-proved social and economic failure which demeans and de-humanizes rather than benefits its hapless victims.

At the same time they push their benevolence, etc., liberal-leftists spew the least loving, most illiberal, and most hateful speech imaginable in civilized society–and they get away with it!

America’s lib-left must not have gotten Obama’s insincere 2011 message of national healing and peace and  civility in Tucson anymore than he got his own message.

Let Sarah Palin espouse family values. and they are all over her calling her a troll.  Let Wisconsin’s Republican Governor Scott Walker balance the state’s budget, with a surplus, and he is denounced and his life and the lives of his family are threatened.  Let conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia support prayers at town meetings and “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance or “In God We Trust” on U.S. currency, and the brilliant jurist is condemned as an ignorant reactionary.

And those are among the most civil observations.

Calling what they rant “free speech” instead of what it clearly is, hate speech, Obama’s acolytes on television and in the entertainment world tend to vomit the most vile invective, oftentimes involving the death of their conservative targets. 

A few examples . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=37108.)

Ending the America We Know and Love (Part Two)

Ending the America We Know and Love (Part Two)

 

We have been conditioned by our progressive president and his lap dog, mainstream media to believe that the massive explosion of black violence is really an illusion concocted by white racists. 

Although it is difficult tell from most media, those often savage attacks are on the rise in America and, along with the acceptance of rampant homosexuality and legalized abortion, are unmistakable evidence of the moral decay now destroying our country.

In truth, the only illusion regarding black rampaging has been created by liberal-leftist progressives who have colluded in denying and covering up the existence of that violence ostensibly in the interests of maintaining what remains of civil order.

A newsflash for those progressives: Your appeasement isn’t even close to working.

Editors at the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, and the Chicago Tribune have publicly conceded that they deliberately censor information about black crime for political reasons.

In June 2011, in an attempt to defend that censorship to its readers following an explosion of black-on-white mob violence in Downtown Chicago, the Tribune’s Gerould Kern disingenuously admitted that his ”newspaper” conceals and downplays black crime in order to “guard against subjecting an entire group of people to suspicion.”

He elaborated by lying, “We do not reference race unless it is a fact that is central to telling the story. By all indication, these attacks were motivated by theft, not race.  Further, there is no evidence to suggest that the victims were singled out because of their race. Therefore we did not include racial descriptions in our initial news reports.”

Kern wrapped up his cover-up of a cover-up by adding another falsehood: “There are circumstances when race may be relevant, such as describing a criminal suspect being sought by police.”

First of all, in a city with a 30% white population where only white people were attacked, ardent liberal-leftist Kern actually suggested that the color of the victims’ skin was coincidental at best? 

Secondly, his reference to Tribune’s identifying the race of assailants when it’s “relevant” borders on the comical; his paper and the rest of Obama’s mainstreamers rarely, if ever, report the race of criminals unless, that is, the criminal happened to be white.

Gerould Kern’s twisted mindset is not unique any more than that particular incident was unique.  Unfortunately for all of us, both his lies concerning rampant black mayhem and the incidents have mushroomed in the last few years, coincidentally with Obama’s first election.

When Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. dreamed in 1963 that his “four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character,” could he have dreamt that within less than three generations his now-grown kids would live in a nation which has absolutely no regard for the content of African-American character and not only overlooks their sins but viciously abuses his fellow African-Americans should they stray from the Gerould Kern mold?

(In fact, as I’ve already documented, the sainted Dr. King probably did dream that and worse for our nation!)

Meanwhile, outstanding African-Americans such as black conservatives Ward Connerly, Ken Hamblin, Niger Innis, Alan Keyes, Thomas Sowell, Walter E. Williams, et al. are regularly condemned by race agitators as “Uncle Toms” and worse for their recognition of the reality that most racist assaults in America are committed by blacks. 

Thanks to Obama and his minions who deny its very existence, the ignored mayhem goes on and on as demonstrated by the increasingly popular and brutal “knockout game” . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=37022.)