Obamacare Death Panels Are Alive and Well

Obamacare Death Panels Are Alive and Well

 

The former “Paper of Record,” the New York Times which enthusiastically endorsed virtually every feature of the greatest scam ever to be foisted on Americans and America’s health care system, is just as enthusiastically touting the glories of Obamacare death panels, the morbid process of  convincing our sickest and most elderly citizens that they are better off dead and shuffling off to the Great Beyond than draining any more of our precious resources.

And, preferably, shuffling off ASAP!

The Times, like other liberal-leftist proponents of President Barack Hussein Obama’s scheme to socialize America’s medical care and treatment in emulation of the UK’s failed, bankrupt National Health Service with all the attendant NHS documented horrors, didn’t see fit to mention those horrors nor did it mention the Times‘ oft-repeated denials that death panels were an integral facet of Obamacare.

After all, why confuse doltish Americans with ugly truths?

Besides, the 2008 GOP vice-presidential candidate, Sarah Palin, had raised a huge stink over Obamacare’s provisions for death panels and was roundly lambasted for her ignorance, so why give her credibility for being absolutely right?

To be sure, the Times‘ article published on Saturday, “Coverage for End-of-Life Talks Gaining Ground” by Pam Belluck, does not describe those conversations between doctors and patients now reimbursed by many Medicare and Medicaid plans as death panels.  

Nor does it attribute the ground-gaining to pressures from Obamacare administrators on doctors and medical facilities to curtail and/or radically increase charges for everything from annual breast exams to prescriptions.

Instead, Belluck credits the avid Obamacare supporter the American Medical Association and cost-conscious insurance companies for agitating in favor of death panels, now deviously and euphemistically called “advanced care planning” since the term “death panels” is so very unsettling and misleading.

Belluck anecdotally cites the sentiments of 80 year old Mary Pat Penell who allegedly told her doctor during her end-of-life discussion, . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=38820.)

Holly Fisher Bugs the Left

Holly Fisher Bugs the Left

 

There’s something about political correctness and related liberal-leftist intolerance toward certain women that I can’t quite put my finger on.  A war on women is indeed being waged in America today, a selective war waged by so-called “progressives” targeting mainly women who take issue with their nonsensical and disturbed attitudes but why are they so incensed?

Could their irrational distaste and anger toward good and decent people spring from their unnatural impulses to despise anyone who  possesses a fundamental sense of decency and morality or is it because good and decent women represent a threat to their perverted life view and feed into their innate sense of self-hating inferiority?

I think both.

Of course, their visceral, continuing contempt for former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin was and is rooted in the fact Mrs. Palin is a conservative, political adversary.  However, the venom has gone far beyond her politics to personal abuse of her family and her religious faith and everything connected with those politically-irrelevant issues.

Another patriotic American, Holly Fisher, recently raised the mindless ire of the lib-left and violated PC ”principles” by daring to assert her First and Second Amendment rights, publicize her Christianity, and demonstrate her respect for human life.
On Independence Day, Holly, a mother of three kids whose husband is serving in the U.S. Army and who is evidently not a big fan of President Barack Hussein Obama, posted two photos on Twitter, one showing her holding a Bible and an AR-15 with an American flag as a backdrop, the other a shot of her sporting a “Pro Life” tee shirt as she carried a Chick-fil-A cup outside a Hobby Lobby store.

As all but low information voters know, ultra-tolerant ”progressives” tolerate everyone and everything–as long as the individuals and ideas involved conform to their rigid philosophy . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=38044.)

Sarah Palin vs. Barack Obama: Who's the Real Dummy?

Sarah Palin vs. Barack Obama: Who's the Real Dummy?

 

Sarah Palin, GOP nominee for the vice presidency in 2008, former mayor of Wasilla, AK, former governor of Alaska, author of the best-selling Going Rogue (over two million copies sold), commentator on Fox News, host of ”Sarah Palin’s Alaska” on TLC and “Amazing America with Sarah Palin” on the Sportsman Channel, and director of SarahPac.com has to be the most maligned woman in America’s political history, apparently because critics allege she’s as dumb as dirt.

Democrats, the same party that charges Republicans are waging a war on women, have been attacking, almost literally warring against Palin ever since she received the GOP nomination six years ago with no let up even today. 

Actually, the gross abuse continually heaped on her, though extreme due to that high profile nomination, is far from unique in view of the fact her Democrat abusers’ modus operandi is to mercilessly attack any and all Republican women running against their nominees.

Mind you, except for exceptional lowlifes such as HBO’s Bill Maher and MSNBC’s Ed Schultz, Dems don’t consider their  amazingly offensive language as abusive but rather as objective critiques on her intelligence and qualifications for public office. 

(The late Teddy Kennedy is their iconic model for intelligent and qualified, as well as moral and ethical, politicians.)

With no foundation to criticize her on the basis of her many accomplishments or her close and loving family or her deep sense of morality or her appearance, Mrs. Palin’s liberal-leftist critics had few other recourses than to say she was just plain stupid.

As Forrest Gump aptly observed, “Stupid is as stupid does.”

Without directly calling the president of the United States stupid, referencing the latest Obama administration scandal with the Veterans Administration, . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=37287.)